Kind of backlinks you just don’t want to get

Backlinks are an important part of any SEO strategy, but not all backlinks are equally valuable. Bad backlinks can harm your website rather than help it. Google penalizes websites that use spammy or irrelevant links, which can lead to lower rankings or even a penalty. In this article, I discuss which bad backlinks you should avoid and why they can be detrimental to your SEO.

Links from linkfarms

Link farms are websites set up for the sole purpose of creating massive backlinks to other sites. These links are of low quality and are considered manipulative by Google. Links from linkfarms do not convey any value to your website and can actually damage your SEO. So always avoid websites that exist just to exchange links.

Irrelevant low-quality links

Getting backlinks from websites that are totally irrelevant to your niche can have negative consequences. For example, if you have an e-commerce website and you get a backlink from a casino website, Google will consider it illogical and unnatural. It is important that the sites linking to you are relevant and within the same or a related field.

Sitewide links

Sitewide links are backlinks that appear on every page of a Web site, such as in the footer or sidebar. While at first glance they can appear to offer a lot of value, they are often seen by Google as unnatural. Sitewide links often occur in link exchanges, which goes against Google’s guidelines. A single link from a relevant page is much more effective than dozens from the same site.

Links from spammy blogs and directories

While it used to be common practice to put your Web site in as many directories as possible, today most of these directories have little to no value. The same goes for blogs that are overtly set up for the sole purpose of selling or trading backlinks. These “spammy” websites convey no authority and can actually damage your SEO. Always look for reliable directories and blogs with good reputations.

Links from PBNs (private blog networks).

Private Blog Networks are networks of websites used to generate backlinks to a specific site. These links may work temporarily, but once Google detects a PBN, your site can be severely penalized. PBN links are considered a manipulative link-building strategy and are very risky.

Links in comments and forums without value

Many Web sites try to get backlinks by posting mass comments on blogs or forums, often with a link back to their own site. If these links are irrelevant or posted in spammy discussions, they can hurt your SEO. Google easily recognizes these types of tactics and penalizes websites that try to rank this way.

How to avoid bad backlinks?

The most important thing in link building is that the links are natural and come from reliable, relevant websites. Focus on quality content and try to obtain organic links through collaborations with authoritative platforms in your niche. In addition, use tools such as Ahrefs or Google Search Console to regularly check your backlink profile and disavow bad backlinks in a timely manner.

Conclusion

Bad backlinks can hurt your SEO strategy considerably. Link farms, irrelevant sites, paid links without nofollow and PBNs are all examples of links you should avoid. By focusing on quality, relevant backlinks, you build a strong backlink profile that contributes to sustainable SEO results.

Senior SEO-specialist

Ralf van Veen

Senior SEO-specialist
Five stars
My clients give me a 5.0 on Google out of 77 reviews

I have been working for 10 years as an independent SEO specialist for companies (in the Netherlands and abroad) that want to rank higher in Google in a sustainable manner. During this period I have consulted A-brands, set up large-scale international SEO campaigns and coached global development teams in the field of search engine optimization.

With this broad experience within SEO, I have developed the SEO course and helped hundreds of companies with improved findability in Google in a sustainable and transparent way. For this you can consult my portfolio, references and collaborations.

This article was originally published on 6 September 2024. The last update of this article was on 11 September 2024. The content of this page was written and approved by Ralf van Veen. Learn more about the creation of my articles in my editorial guidelines.