How Claude from Anthropic selects and processes content

The rise of AI search engines is changing the way content is read and reused. One of the most advanced models at the moment is Claude, developed by Anthropic. Claude stands out for its focus on security, nuance and ability to process vast amounts of text at once. But how does Claude select which content is usable and what does that mean for how I write content?

What is Claude?

Claude is a conversational AI developed by Anthropic. The latest models (Claude Opus 3, Haiku 3.5, Sonnet 4 and Opus 4) can process more than 200,000 tokens at once. That’s complete books of text. Claude is used in environments such as claude.ai, Slack and Notion AI. The AI is praised for its ability to provide nuanced, in-depth answers while maintaining context.

For me as an SEO specialist, Claude is interesting because the model not only generates answers, but does so based on content that is interpreted as reliable, clear and relevant.

This requires a focused approach in content creation.

How Claude selects content

Claude does not work based on classical search algorithms, like Google Search. The model does not crawl the Web live, but is trained on large amounts of text and can also analyze documents uploaded or linked by users.

When Claude answers a question, it uses:

  1. His training dates (information up to a certain cut off)
  2. Entered context (such as a supplied document)
  3. Live linked resources (via APIs or tool integrations)

This means that content is included only if:

  • It is part of the model’s training data, either
  • It is fed directly to Claude (via a document, prompt or URL), AND
  • The content is strong enough to serve as a response

What does Claude pay attention to in content processing?

I see some clear patterns in test cases. Claude values:

1. Information density while maintaining nuance

Claude values depth of content. Pages that consist only of superficial explanations or standard definitions are ignored. Therefore, make sure your content has enough depth: practical examples, context, scenarios, pros and cons.

At the same time, Claude seeks balance: the model ignores texts that are too long-winded or difficult to follow. Short, substantively powerful paragraphs work best.

2. Logical structure

Good structure is essential. I always work with clear intermediate headings, chronological structure and clear transitions. Claude “reads” the text from top to bottom as a human would. Therefore, the structure must be correct.

Questions as interjections are extra effective. They form anchor points for Claude to highlight or paraphrase specific answers.

3. Understandable, natural language

Claude is trained on human language. Content that sounds unnatural or is written overtly for search engines is more likely to be excluded. So I always write as I speak: direct, clear and without unnecessary embellishment.

4. Consistency and authority

Claude values consistent language and source referencing. I mention whenever possible that the content comes from me as a specialist, and refer to additional sources or previous pages as context. This is how I build my position as a trusted source. This helps Claude assess relevance.

5. Long contexts: complete answers by section

Because Claude can handle large amounts of text at once, I take advantage of that by building each section as a self-contained block. Each headline has a question or clear focus, and the answer to it is complete: not single sentences, but a completed story within 300 to 500 words.

Aan de slag met SEO? Neem gerust contact op.

Senior SEO-specialist






    How I optimize content for Claude

    Optimizing for Claude differs from optimizing for Google or ChatGPT in a number of ways:

    • I use longer, deeper sections with clear focus
    • I avoid too many short answers or loose definitions
    • I include concrete practical information that is not easily found elsewhere
    • I write content that feels logical to both people and models

    Where Google looks for backlinks and engagement, and ChatGPT looks for training recognition, Claude looks for content reliability within long, logically constructed text chains.

    Old content also plays a role, as long as it is well written and logically fits within the topic.

    What does Claude mean for your content strategy?

    When I write content with Claude in mind, I do it not just to rank, but to be understood and to be cited as a resource. The goal is not to generate clicks, but to provide answers.

    That requires a different mindset:

    • Write not for ranking, but for explainability
    • Focus not on keywords, but on questions and connections
    • Optimize not for bots, but for readers, of which AI is also one

    Summary

    Claude shows how language models analyze content in a way closer to human reading than ever before. By understanding how Claude selects and processes, I can build content smarter. I ensure that that content remains visible, even in a future where AI becomes the primary source of information.

    Want to know if your content is right for Claude? Or would you like to see together how to integrate this approach into your existing strategy? Feel free to send me a message. I’d love to help you further.

    Senior SEO-specialist

    Ralf van Veen

    Senior SEO-specialist
    Five stars
    My clients give me a 5.0 on Google out of 85 reviews

    I have been working for 12 years as an independent SEO specialist for companies (in the Netherlands and abroad) that want to rank higher in Google in a sustainable manner. During this period I have consulted A-brands, set up large-scale international SEO campaigns and coached global development teams in the field of search engine optimization.

    With this broad experience within SEO, I have developed the SEO course and helped hundreds of companies with improved findability in Google in a sustainable and transparent way. For this you can consult my portfolio, references and collaborations.

    This article was originally published on 15 July 2025. The last update of this article was on 18 July 2025. The content of this page was written and approved by Ralf van Veen. Learn more about the creation of my articles in my editorial guidelines.